Sunday, May 12, 2019

Read the attached case and write a legal brief of the case Study

Read the attached and write a legal instruct of the - Case Study Examples motion, the District court suppressed the data obtained through GpS spell the vehicle was parked at Joness residence but accepted the remaining data on the ground that Jones had no reasonable expectation of privacy on public streets. The D.C Circuit reversed the strong belief on the ground that warrantless use of GpS violated the fourthly Amendment. Government approached the Supreme Court.A. Rule The one-quarter Amendment provides that the even off of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure, shall not be violated. The governments claim that a search has not occurred is rejected because in Katz v. United States (1967), the Court observed that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places, and found violation in the attachment of an eavesdropping device to a public telephone.B. Application though the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence w as mainly tied to common-law trespass till the second half of twentieth century, it deviated after that and started protecting the privacy of people, not places. The vehicle comes under effect as provided in Fourth Amendment, and it is not an open field as claimed by the

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.